Introduction
The blog, “A Short Guide to Open Source Licenses,”by David Skaife, helps us understand the often confusing world of open source licenses. Let’s break down the key points to make sense of why these licenses matter in the world of computer software.
Understanding Open Source Licenses
Open-source licenses are like rules for sharing computer code. They tell us how we can use, share, and change the source code. These rules help protect the original creators and make it easier for others to use the code without asking for permission each time.
Clearing up Myths: Public Repositories and Licensing
Skaife talks about a common misunderstanding of just putting code on a public platform, like GitHub, doesn’t automatically make it open source. Without a clear set of rules (license) with the code, it’s still protected by copyright, and others can’t freely use or change it. So, it’s crucial to attach a license if you want others to use your code.
Making Sense of Licenses
Skaife acknowledges that there are many licenses, but he suggests focusing on a few popular ones. He also mentions the Open Source Initiative (OSI), which approves licenses, making it easier for us to choose from reliable options.
License Types: Strict vs. Flexible
There are two main types of licenses – strict (copyleft) and flexible. Strict licenses say that if you change the code, your new version must also follow the same rules. Flexible licenses are more relaxed, letting people use, change, and share the code more freely.
Exploring Five Common Licenses
There are five common licenses we might choose from:
- MIT License: Simple and flexible, allowing changes with few conditions.
- Apache License 2.0: Similar to MIT but a bit more complicated, addressing specific issues like trademark rights.
- GNU General Public License (GPL) v2.0 and v3.0: Strict licenses, ensuring all changes follow the same rules, with v3.0 adding more details.
- GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) v2.1 and v3.0: Less strict than GPL, allowing some exceptions for linking.
- Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) 2-clause and 3-clause variants: Flexible licenses, similar to MIT, with the 3-clause version having extra rules about using contributors’ names.
conclusion
Skaife’s guide helps us navigate open source licenses, making it easier to understand the rules for sharing and using computer code. With this knowledge, anyone working with open source software can feel more confident contributing, using, or creating, fostering a collaborative and innovative community. For those wanting more information, Skaife suggests checking out resources like the Open Source Initiative’s licenses pages and GitHub’s “choosealicence.com.”
reference
The Bits & Bytes Universe 
Leave a comment